Peter Fletcher

  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact

The Perth Property Market: Free Drinks For Everyone

August 31, 2021 by Peter Fletcher

Perth Property Market Performance w/e 29 Aug 2021

For yet another week the Perth property market is showing strength and resilience. Despite Sydney and Melbourne being in lockdown, the Perth market is shaking its hair like it just don’t care. Agents and sellers alike are enjoying a party sponsored by property buyers who just can’t or won’t stop shelling out money at the Good Times In Property Bar.

And, as with any party where the drinks are free, there are always opportunists, this time in the shape of sellers who haven’t enjoyed a free bar tab since 2105-16. Selling now is their way of downing the free drinks and sneaking off with a cheeky roady. Their strategy is to take the free drinks and run.

But, as evidenced by the ridiculously low stock levels, there are plenty of other sellers who have decided to play the long game. These are the sellers who love nothing more than to sit back and watch everyone else drink themselves silly. They know that doing a runner with the free drinks is a recipe for waking up next morning with nothing more than a knowing smile and a hangover.

They know that parties come and go and would prefer to sit back and sip the fine red wine of long-term property ownership.

As for the buyers shelling out their hard-earned, there are some that really do take a line out of the Sammi Smith playbook: Let the devil take tomorrow ’cause tonight I need a friend. Paying 50 or 100 grand over the asking price on their dream home is tomorrow’s problem.

For now it’s pay day, there’s money on the credit card and there’s a party to enjoy.

And look, these buyers may well be right. Unlike most of the other capital cities in Australia, Perth’s property values are lower than they were back in 2016. Right now the Perth median price of $515,000 is lower than it’s all-time peak of $520,000 in December 2016.

At the level of city-wide median prices paying over the odds seems justifiable. But at the individual property level paying too much is paying too much. Every dollar that you pay over the actual value of the property is eating into tomorrow’s capital growth.

The trick for home buyers is to figure out how much a home is really worth. Agents have years of practice and owners, especially those who are thinking of selling, spend countless hours walking through neighbour home opens and analysing the latest sales in their area. Buyers, on the other hand, have to make a decision and make it fast. And they have to make a decision in a highly competitive environment where they’re competing with other buyers.

It’s a crowded party and pretty much no one wants to miss out being served.

Filed Under: Real Estate

Perth Property Market Performance – W/E 22 August 2021

August 24, 2021 by Peter Fletcher

Perth Property Market Snapshot Infographic

Sales up, listings down as the Perth property market continues its bull run.

The Perth property market bull run continued last week with sales up on the previous week, while listing stock fell. Again.

It’s an ongoing trend in Perth. Listings are scarce with agents reporting multiple offers on stock that’s even remotely good value.

And it’s catching some agents by surprise. I spoke to one recently who was shocked to achieve over $100,000 above the asking price…on a property he thought was valued in the low $400’s.

How it’s even possible that either the buyer or the agent could be so far wrong is beyond me. But, hey, it’s a crazy property market.

A closer look at the numbers reveal lower demand for units. The percentage of units that sold as a percentage of unit listings was 6% while for houses the number was 15%.

What that tells me is the great Australian dream of backyard cricket and swinging on the Hills Hoist is alive and well.

The bullish sentiment is flowing through to property settlement numbers with our business up nearly 100% on the same time last year.

As the weather warms up, expect more listings to come to the market with a corresponding rise in sales activity.

Filed Under: Real Estate Tagged With: perth market activity, perth property market, property market, real estate

Perth property market report

May 13, 2020 by Peter Fletcher


Perth property market infographic from REIWADespite the economic doom and gloom reported by mainstream media lately, REIWA figures point to the Perth property market being in better shape now than it was this time last year. 

For the week ending 10th May just gone there were 527 sales across the Perth metro area. Compare that with the 505 for the same week last year. 

That’s an improvement of over 4%.

Clearly buyers have formed the view that neither COVID nor the predicted economic damage caused by the non-lockdown lockdown is reason enough to put their lives on hold.

Buyers are back and they’re buying!

But buyer activity is only half the story.

Since late 2019 listing stock levels have been trending downwards. 

Today there are just 11,611 properties on the market. Twelve months ago that number was 16,593 last year.

Over the past 12 months stock levels have fallen by 30%!

And they’ve continued to trend down despite the so-called Corona crisis, falling 5% in the past month alone. 

That decline is a clear indicator that, despite the swirling chatter about unemployment and recession, property owners believe that real estate in Perth is worth holding.

And that bodes well for the future of property prices in WA. 

I’m keen to hear your thoughts on the direction of the Perth property market in the comments below. 

Filed Under: Industry news, Real Estate Tagged With: Perth real estate, Perth real estate market, property, real estate

Mandating madness: The case against compulsory e-conveyancing

February 14, 2017 by Peter Fletcher

A photo of an insane man

Mandating madness. Photo credit: Anno Málie on Flickr

Disclosure

In the interest of full disclosure, I am: 

  • A Director of Residential Settlements, a mid-sized real estate settlement agency in Burswood, Western Australia
  • A PEXA subscriber
  • A councillor of the Australian Institute of Conveyancers WA
  • All views expressed herein are my own and should in no way be viewed as reflective of the position of the AICWA council.
  • This post has not been vetted or endorsed by AICWA.

Introduction

On 13 December 2016 the Registrar of Titles signalled her intent to require that, pursuant to powers granted to her by s182A of the Transfer of Land Act and commencing 1 December 2017, “all eligible land registry documents to be lodged electronically through an electronic lodgment network such as the one operated by Property Exchange Australia (PEXA)”. 

I oppose that requirement. In the words that follow I explain why.

The arguments I will advance are founded on protecting the long term future of all settlement agents in WA. They are also founded on the belief that conveyancers are fundamentally progressive. 

As an industry we have embraced Revenue Online without being compelled to do so by legislation. And we have actively engaged with both Landgate and PEXA with the intention of contributing our skills and expertise toward the creation of a platform that serves the needs of both conveyancers and consumers.

Individually, I support e-conveyancing. We need a more efficient system, one that uses the best technologies for the benefit of business and consumers alike.  We need to free ourselves from manual document checking and from running around picking up bank cheques on the morning of settlement. These, amongst many others, are activities that have been forced upon our industry by banks and Landgate. 

Electronic conveyancing has benefits for both consumers and conveyancers. Buyers will have their name registered on the title instantly, there’ll be less settlement delays as a result of the signatures on the Transfer of Land and the mortgage being different, and sellers will have access to their funds sooner.

But these are of marginal benefit for consumers. In the 30+ years I’ve been involved in real estate, I’ve never once had a buyer ask me how soon their name would appear on the title. Most signature mismatches can be sorted on the same day. And I’ve rarely had a seller ask for instant access to their funds.

It’s my belief that we don’t need the blunt force trauma of mandating in order for the industry to adopt it. We don’t need big business lecturing us about how to run our business. And we don’t need legislators bullying our industry into dancing to a song played by big bank executives.

I’m aware that Landgate knows about at least some of the concerns raised in this article. Still, aside from corporate speak that commits to nothing, the legitimate concerns raised by the industry and mentioned below remain unaddressed. 

In daily life I have a low tolerance for whingers, those people who clang like an empty tin can but who never offer a solution. Therefore, toward the end of this article, I propose a way forward for all of the industry.

A brief history of electronic conveyancing in WA

The Electronic Conveyancing Act 2014 was created as a result of “the Intergovernmental Agreement for an Electronic Conveyancing National Law (“IGA”) signed by all Australian States and the Northern Territory. The IGA came into operation on 21 November 2011.” The act corresponded with the Electronic Conveyancing National Law (ECNL) and created some consequential amendments to related legislation including, amongst others,  the Transfer of Land Act 1893 and the Settlement Agents Act 1981. 

The act provided for the appointment of an Electronic Lodgment Network Operator (ELNO) to provide and operate an Electronic Lodgment Network (ELN) “that enables the [preparation and] lodging of registry instruments and other documents in electronic form for the purposes of the land titles legislation.” Property Exchange Australia Ltd (PEXA, previously National E-Conveyancing Development Limited (NECDL)) was formed in early 2010 with the purpose of becoming the first ELNO. To this point it is the only ELNO in Australia.

PEXA’s activities are regulated by Australian Registrars’ National Electronic Conveyancing Council (ARNECC) who determine the rules to which ELNOs and Subscribers must adhere.

About PEXA

In addition to acting as an ELNO, PEXA has positioned itself as a virtual settlement room, replacing the existing requirement to physically attend settlement with documents and bank cheques. They predict that, as a result of the use of their services, “the conveyancing costs associated with buying or selling a property will reduce by $120 to $150 per transaction based on direct reductions in disbursements and the increased efficiency of service provision.”

According to the Landgate Annual Report 2015/16, Landgate owns a 14.31% stake in PEXA. 

Along with a variety of other fees, PEXA charge $107.80 for the lodgment of a land transfer document. 

The effects of mandating

The following tables identify the broad gains and losses that flow to various stakeholders as a result of the mandating of e-conveyancing.

PEXA

PEXA is set to become the primary beneficiary should mandating proceed. They will gain a significant increase in income over a very short period of time and the precedent set in WA will create a template for other jurisdictions to follow. For PEXA, mandating is a dream play.

Established as an effective monopoly Gain
A substantial increase in income over a very short time frame Gain
Slows down their cash burn rate, profitable faster Gain
Entrenches first mover advantage, no time for other tech companies to create a competitive offering Gain
Increases their valuation at IPO, estimated at $1 billion Gain
Creates a precedent for other jurisdictions Gain
Increase in support staff required to assist settlement agents with the transition Loss

Landgate

Landgate will also be a significant beneficiary of mandating particularly through reductions in labour costs.

Will no longer need to manually check the eligibility of documents at the point of lodgment Gain
Will be able to reduce staff numbers Gain
Will become more profitable Gain
Established as a template in the development of “a single world class registry system… operated
under a Business Process Outsourcing (BPO) commercial arrangement…”
Gain
Will be more valuable if Landgate should be privatised Gain

Settlement agents

Forced to use PEXA for most transactions Neutral
Because all  have to use PEXA no-one is at a price advantage when quoting. This gain may become neutral if the Code is amended. Gain
Significant amount of business process changes Loss
Settlement agents will find the PEXA fee easier to pass on to clients if it’s compulsory and everyone else is using it Gain
Need to invest heavily in training to teach conveyancers how to use PEXA Loss
Outside clerks will be made redundant Gain
Exposed to increased business and regulatory risk Loss

Banks

Reduced reliance on mortgage settlement services such as SAIG, FMS, Scott Ashwood Gain
Will need to retool their processes to reflect that manual checking of mortgage and land transfer documents is no longer required Loss

Mortgage settlement services/intermediaries

Will lose most of their mortgage settlement service business overnight with the an Australia-wide loss estimated at $124 million Loss

The reasons to oppose mandating

It’s the wrong thing to do by consumers

  • Despite PEXA’s claims to the contrary, their fees will “invariably passed on to the customer”. As a result, the cost of a settlement will increase by around $150.
  • Because PEXA is an effective monopoly there will be no downward pressure on their prices. Although they are required to maintain a “publicly available, equitable and transparent pricing policy” their prices are otherwise unregulated. If electronic settlements are mandated consumers are forced to accept whatever price PEXA charge.  
  • Without a competitor there’s no competitive pressure or incentive to improve the PEXA product.
  • There are numerous contracts (particularly off-the-plan contracts) that are or will be awaiting settlement as of 1 December 2017. If one or both parties to those contracts refuse to vary the definition of the term “settlement” and clause 3.4 of the Joint Form of General Conditions (JFGC) any attempt to settle electronically exposes the client to potentially significant legal risks.  

It’s the wrong thing to do by the industry

Real estate agents won’t be ready

REIWA and the Law Society of WA are currently working on amendments to the JFGC that address the issues raised by e-conveyancing. The new e-conveyancing-ready version of the JFGC is due for release in the second half of 2017. This will give REIWA and the Department of Commerce approximately 120 days to train over 12,000 real estate agents and registered sales reps on the implications to them and their clients of the changes to the JFGC. These implications will include:

  • The compulsory verification of identity for buyers. Agents who write short-dated contracts for buyers who live overseas or in remote locations may expose the buyer to legal risks including penalty interest if the buyer is unable to have their identity verified in time for settlement.
  • The effects of withdrawal notices on the settlement date. There maybe legitimate reasons why a settlement has to be withdrawn from the electronic environment. When that happens a paper-based settlement will be required and this may cause significant delays while new documentation is prepared, issued, signed and exchanged.
  • Depending on how the JFGC is written there may be changes to the way penalty interest is charged in the event of a delayed settlement.
  • There may be other issues that arise as a result of the wording of the new JFGC but these won’t be known until after they’re released.

Settlement agents will face additional risks

Settlement agents, and lawyers performing settlements,  face additional risks that include:

  • Landgate and PEXA have provided insufficient training on the platform. Untrained and inexperienced conveyancers may place consumers’ funds and legal rights at risk. It will take a significant amount of time before a substantial majority of the industry has sufficient skills and experience to be aware of and mitigate the risks created by settling electronically.
  • There are still questions over what professional indemnity insurance coverage will be available to settlement agents if a client was to incur a loss as a result of  settling a transaction on PEXA. The worst case scenario is for a client to sustain a loss and the settlement agent not have PI coverage. It will take months, if not years, before insurers will be in a position to understand the risks of e-conveyancing and price the coverage of those risks.
  • Banks are still not ready to settle online. Retooling of long-established systems will take time. Mandating places consumers at risk of a delayed settlement because banks are simply not geared up for electronic conveyancing.
  • Settlement agents are placed at risk of breaching the Settlement Agents Act and other consumer legislation if they fail to disclose the PEXA fee to their client. Rule 6B of the Code of Conduct requires that settlement agents disclose their service amount. To assist consumers to compare quotes that amount must not include government, statutory and financial institution charges. As the PEXA fee includes a component of a statutory charge (a check search) and a financial institution charge (the amount usually charged for bank cheques) it has come to inhabit a dead zone that settlement agents are being told to navigate on their own and at their own peril. If they include the PEXA fee as part of their service amount they risk breaching Rule 6B of the Code. If they don’t include it in the service amount they may be found in contravention of s44(9) of the Settlement Agents Act and face a criminal conviction. If for no other reason, all thoughts about mandating should be abandoned until this issue has been resolved.
  • Mandating will place PEXA – an effective monopoly – in a position to dictate unfavourable and onerous terms and conditions on subscribers. These terms and conditions won’t be open to negotiation and may pose additional financial and legal risks for settlement agents.

The platform isn’t ready

As much as PEXA and Landgate are spruiking the benefits of the platform, it’s a long, long way from being ready to handle large scale adoption. Just some of the issues that need to be addressed are as follows:

  • Digital signatures don’t match bank signatures. This means that a licensee can’t effectively delegate their authority to sign the transfer in the same way they would delegate their authority to sign trust account cheques to two staff members. What happens if they run a three person operation consisting of the licensee and two unlicensed employees and wish to go on holidays? Who has the electronic signature? At the moment the only option is to provide one of the employees with a digital signature and let them sign in the absence of the licensee. But this move gives the employee unlimited single-signature authority over the trust account via their PEXA digital signature. There are zero checks and balances, which is poor trust account management practice.  
  • No built in bank account verification. One of PEXA’s boasts is that funds will be available in a client’s bank account (usually) on the day of settlement. It’s a great sales pitch. But it’s fatally flawed. Why? Because there’s no built-in verification that the account number belongs to the client. With a manual settlement, cheques are banked across the counter at which point the teller checks the name on the account with the name on the cheque. It’s a simple procedure which stops often large cheques ending up in the wrong person’s bank account. But there’s no such verification procedure in PEXA. That means a $500,000+ deposit could be made into a perfect strangers bank account if, for example, a transposition error were made when the account details were entered into PEXA. I know for a fact this scares a lot of conveyancers and is why many are refusing to jump on the PEXA bandwagon. 
  • As of now, the PEXA system only handles three transactions in a daisy chain (sales that depend on each other to effect settlement). Longer chains (it’s not uncommon to have five in a daisy chain) will still require manual settlement.
  • The PEXA system doesn’t handle properties with caveats where the caveator isn’t represented by a PEXA subscriber. This scenario occurs as a result of fencing disputes, unsecured loans and domestic relationship separations. 
  • If someone bails out of an electronic settlement there are significant time and monetary costs involved in the additional work required to retroactively sign the documents required to settle manually. If electronic settlements are mandated, this scenario will happen regularly as a result of one or more of the banks involved in the transaction not having their systems ready to accommodate the issues posed by electronic conveyancing. 

Mandating doesn’t pass the sniff test

There’s something just not right in the Registrar using the power granted to them by the government of WA to nurture the establishment of an effective monopoly in PEXA, of which the Registrar’s employer is a substantial shareholder.

It’s a conflict of interest of the grandest proportion and one that the CEO of PEXA Marcus Price is well aware. A 2015 Sydney Morning Herald article noted: “Mr Price said they want to sell the business after it begins to make a profit. In part this is because they will have a conflict of interest in being both owners and customers of the system. The most likely natural owners would be retail investors.”

Through mandating, the people of WA will be forced to pay for a defective product in order to help make big banks and professional investors rich when PEXA lists on the stock exchange.

Those who point to the ASX as proof that a monopoly can be a good thing should think again! There is broad agreement that the ASX should be exposed to competition. According to Federal Treasurer Scott Morrison, “the government [is] committed to open and competitive markets which are “fundamental to a vibrant 21st century economy””.

Mandating the use of an effective monopoly when the rest of Australia is moving to open and competitive markets smacks of a greedy, short-term cash grab at the expensive of WA consumers.

What needs to be done

For the real benefits of electronic settlements to be realised, it’s important that everyone involved in the process “transition quickly”, but in an orderly manner.

If the transition isn’t orderly it will leave businesses and consumers battered, bruised and resentful.

Therefore the Registrar should immediately defer all plans to mandate electronic lodgment. This move will allow banks, settlement agents and the real estate industry the time needed to re-engineer their systems without exposing clients and small business to further risk.

ARNECC should then immediately introduce rules into their Model Operating Requirements making it compulsory that all ELNOs provide a standards-based means of interoperability between one another. Interoperability is essential if subscribers are to be allowed to choose between ELNOs. Establishing standards for interoperability will help create the certainty needed for corporations to invest in the establishment of other ELNOs.

AICWA need to continue their efforts to stop mandating, however they need to do more to assist their members achieve an orderly transition to electronic conveyancing. They should speed up the delivery of relevant training courses that address the business issues created by the use of electronic conveyancing. Course topics could include:

  • Risk management in an electronic environment
  • PEXA fee disclosure that works for the consumer without landing you in jail
  • How to deal with redundancies
  • Change management
  • Digital security
  • Services marketing

Yet, as much as the AICWA need to work hard for their members, Landgate and PEXA need to help with the heavy lifting. To speed the uptake of e-conveyancing they need to partner with AICWA to create free or low cost training to settlement agents, financial institutions and lawyers on the use of the PEXA platform. These courses need to be offered regularly, often, and at times that suit the conveyancers.

The Department of Commerce should immediately set about amending the Code of Conduct to address the issue created by PEXA’s fees. It would make sense to remove the fee disclosure requirement in r23 in their entirety and replace it with a more general requirement for the agent to act in accordance with Australian Consumer Law.

Finally, regulations should be introduced into the the Electronic Conveyancing Act 2014 or other appropriate legislation to the effect that, until such time as there is more than one ELNO, the fees charged by PEXA be capped to a maximum amount approved by the Commissioner for Consumer Protection.

These are no small undertakings. If implemented, they will ensure a better deal for the consumers of Western Australia and help make the transition to e-conveyancing smooth, orderly and quick.

If you’ve made it this far and share my view that mandating is madness, please do one or more of the following:

  • Share this post on Facebook, LinkedIn, GooglePlus and Twitter
  • Send it to your friends and colleagues via email
  • Send it to your local MP
  • Send it to your local media outlet
  • Create a Meetup group to discuss what more you can do to stop mandating

Filed Under: Business, Industry news, Real Estate, Settlement Industry Tagged With: ARNECC, Code of Conduct, e-conveyancing, ELNO, JFGC, Joint Form of General Conditions, Landgate, mandating, monopoly, MOR, NECDL, PEXA, Registrar, REIWA, SAA, settlement agents, Settlement Agents Act

Does your real estate investment survive the Back of The Envelope Test

June 19, 2014 by Peter Fletcher

I’m going to start out this (short) post with a disclaimer: This is not investment advice. Rather, these are reflections on what’s worked for well for me when I’ve bought and sold properties.

Here’s the deal. If the investment doesn’t look great when you do the sums on the back of the envelope (0r a napkin or whatever scrap of paper you have available at the time) it probably won’t get better when you run the numbers through a fancy Excel spreadsheet. And it definitely won’t get better by spending more money on a renovation.

The sums that you’ll fit on the back of the envelope are these:

  1. Purchase price,
  2. Stamp duty and bank fees,
  3. Renovation costs,
  4. Interest,
  5. Agent fees,
  6. Profit (yes, that’s a cost to the development),
  7. Sale price of the end product.

If these numbers don’t show a conservative 15% profit start looking at #1.

Most junior investors blow their budget on renovations and most projects last longer than anticipated  – and that blows out the interest costs. That only leaves the sale price as a variable and, in the main, there’s little you can do about that. Sure agents will tell you that they’ll get an amazing price for the property but the reality is they can only do as much as the market at the time will allow them.

And that brings us back to the purchase price. Work on getting that right. If you can’t, find another option.

Filed Under: Real Estate Tagged With: development, finance, investing, renovation

Create a listing presentation that converts – meetup notes

March 6, 2014 by Peter Fletcher

Davide Palermo from Professionals Victoria Park demonstrates his listing presentation

A great listing presentation will help you convert appraisals into listings.

On the first Thursday of every month, Emily and I host an agents’ meetup. It started out as a space to discuss digital marketing but last month that shifted to something far more grounded in agency practice.

Tonight, that something was listing presentations.

At the start of tonight’s meetup I made it clear that passengers weren’t welcome. I wanted everyone to share their secret sauce and in the process pick up some great sales and marketing tips.

Matt Jones from Granger Clark kicked things off with a full run through of his presentation. Central to Matt’s presentation is an A4 sheet that contains a grid of pictures that serve as a visual story board. It takes the prospective seller on a journey from selecting a marketing plan, to presenting the home and accepting an offer. Most of the story board items are accompanied by printed examples of the marketing Matt undertakes.

Next up was Dave Palermo from Professionals Victoria Park. Dave uses an iPad Keynote presentation to convey his message. It’s a slick presentation complete with smooth transition effects and videos. He segues to other programmes, such as MyDesktop, to demonstrate the buyers he has on the database that could suit the property. Dave’s a good storyteller and is uses examples of both good and bad property photography to explain his point.

Matthew Jones (Yes, that’s not a typo, there were two Matt Joneses present.) from Mair & Co. was next. His presentation used a bound A4 presentation that contained sales evidence, his recommendations and the various solutions he had to offer. Mat believes that agents should talk less about themselves and their marketing solutions and more about the customer’s needs.

Belinda Dufall from Harcourts Realty Plus has listed 20 properties in her first 9 months using the Set Date Sale method. She recently sold a property for $60,000 higher than the highest market appraisal by marketing the property without a price and allowing the market to decide the value.

The group also discussed overcoming objections around fee levels, what to do when your competing against someone with an established relationship with the seller and how to maximise the impact of having multiple buyers.

I came away from the meeting inspired to tell more stories in my marketing and looking forward to next month.

The next meetup will be on Thursday, April 3. To register, send me an email.

Filed Under: Real Estate Tagged With: listing presentations, meetups

The world’s worst real estate photos

January 26, 2014 by Peter Fletcher

If you’re looking for some comic relief go check out this blog and it’s associated Twitter account.

Some of these pics are just wrong…but very funny.

Here’s a sample to get you started.

A rare example of what architectural historians refer to as a “fertility window”: http://t.co/xlUG9cHQ9J pic.twitter.com/Fvqfi8cJHp

— Bad Realty Photos (@BadRealtyPhotos) December 12, 2013

 

Where did they go, and are they still in the house? http://t.co/xlUG9cHQ9J pic.twitter.com/uAmmzm6WVL

— Bad Realty Photos (@BadRealtyPhotos) January 16, 2014

 

A recent restraining order prevents this agent being seen within 500 yards of the building. http://t.co/xlUG9cHQ9J pic.twitter.com/F9BrHw5BPr

— Bad Realty Photos (@BadRealtyPhotos) January 2, 2014

 

Agent gives up sales in favour of documenting an accident involving some brown sludge.http://t.co/xlUG9cHQ9J pic.twitter.com/1oW1ZEe9Hb

— Bad Realty Photos (@BadRealtyPhotos) December 29, 2013

 

Blurring the boundaries between inept photography and conceptual art: http://t.co/xlUG9cHQ9J pic.twitter.com/SHG5LAddn0

— Bad Realty Photos (@BadRealtyPhotos) December 16, 2013

 

Ideal for those of you with a particularly fast metabolism. http://t.co/xlUG9cHQ9J pic.twitter.com/qY8z1Tcd0v

— Bad Realty Photos (@BadRealtyPhotos) November 29, 2013

Filed Under: Daily blog, Real Estate

About Peter

Speaker, trainer and coach. I write about living, loving and working better. Love a challenge. More...

Subscribe

Get the latest posts delivered to your inbox.

Recent Posts

  • The Perth Property Market: Free Drinks For Everyone
  • Perth Property Market Performance – W/E 22 August 2021
  • Perth property market report
  • Mandating madness: The case against compulsory e-conveyancing
  • PEXA: Stop treating conveyancers like idiots

Top Posts & Pages

  • Foucault on power relations
  • Foucault on Confession
  • Home Page
  • Why saying "You've got potential" can be the worst thing to say
  • Databases as discourse | Mark Poster
  • Blog
  • Deconstructing queer theory | Steven Seidman
  • My Experiment With The Facebook Comments Plugin
  • About Peter Fletcher
  • So just why did you add me as a Friend?

Location

You can find me at Residential Settlements in Burswood.

5/170 Burswood Road
Burswood WA 6100

Let’s catch up

If you're ready to take your business to the next level, get in touch with me now.

Send me an email using the contact form or call me direct on 0419 538 838.

Connect

Connect with me on one of these social networks.
  • Facebook
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Tumblr
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2022 · Agency Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in