Will I ever tire of re-working my thesis statement? I already am, but I’m going to continue.
This is what I outlined in my honours presentation:
- Examine the tensions arising from the publication of personal blogs by employees
- Employing a Foucauldian analysis
- Of contestation located around two prominent personal bloggers
I want to work it into a more concise question.
What would a Foucauldian analysis of the contestation found on and around dooce and QueenofSky reveal about the tensions arising from the publication of personal blogs by employees?
It seems clunky. How about:
What do Foucault’s theories say about the contestation found on and around dooce and QueenofSky?
I dropped the last part because that’s really something that may come out of the analysis rather than what I’m doing.
And then:
What do Michel Foucault’s theories indicate about the employment tensions found on and around dooce and QueenofSky?
This last one is more concise. I like.
Best I run off and get some feedback from super coach M.