Peter Fletcher

  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact

Foucualt’s response to Kant

April 1, 2008 by Peter Fletcher

Foucault critiques Kant’s article Was ist Aufklärung? and notes that Kant believes that enlightenment is both and individual task and a responsibility of society. He shows how Kant believes enlightenment cannot be achieved whilst we are immature, by which he means that we simply take orders where reason could be applied. Examples are given. Relying on the answer in a book, relying on the orders of a spiritual advisor for our conscience, and being told by a doctor what to eat.

Kant observes the way reason can be applied in public for reason’s sake. We might pay our taxes and then debate the rationale behind their payment, or we could give pastoral care and then debate religious dogma. Using reason for reason’s sake demonstrates maturity, a necessary step toward achieving enlightenment. He distinguishes between public and private reason and notes that private reason may be willfully circumscribed by reason of a person’s station in life. A person in the army may not have the same degree of latitude to debate an order but reason would have it that obeying the order provides a worthy end.

“…when one is reasoning as a member of reasonable humanity, then the use of reason must be free and public. Enlightenment is thus not merely the process by which individuals would see their own personal freedom of thought guaranteed. There is Enlightenment when the universal, the free, and the public uses of reason are superimposed on one another.”

Related posts:

  1. An Answer to the Question: "What is Enlightenment? | Imanuel Kant Some observations on An Answer to the Question: “What is...
  2. Civil society: Beyond the public sphere | Jodi Dean This is a review of a book chapter from Jodi...
  3. Foucault on power relations Please note: this post is under construction whilst I read...
  4. The Fractalization of the Public and Private I sense my thesis will address the issue of what...
  5. The end of the pubic space on the internet? The point is made that the initial hopes for the...

Filed Under: Uncategorized Tagged With: Enlightenment, Kant, Michel Foucault

Comments

  1. justacouch says

    September 12, 2008 at 8:06 pm

    I don’t think Kant was advocating reason for reason’s sake. He was advocating public reason for the sake of enlightenment. The principle of reason (Everything must have a reason) provides no reason for itself. There is no reason for reason, and so no reason for reason’s sake.

About Peter

Speaker, trainer and coach. I write about living, loving and working better. Love a challenge. More...

Subscribe

Get the latest posts delivered to your inbox.

Recent Posts

  • The Perth Property Market: Free Drinks For Everyone
  • Perth Property Market Performance – W/E 22 August 2021
  • Perth property market report
  • Mandating madness: The case against compulsory e-conveyancing
  • PEXA: Stop treating conveyancers like idiots

Location

You can find me at Residential Settlements in Burswood.

5/170 Burswood Road
Burswood WA 6100

Let’s catch up

If you're ready to take your business to the next level, get in touch with me now.

Send me an email using the contact form or call me direct on 0419 538 838.

Connect

Connect with me on one of these social networks.
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Tumblr
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2022 · Agency Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in