It isn't just workers who get fired for blog posts. Students are also coming under fire for their contributions to MySpace reports Associated Press. The battle for control over blogs as public spaces is not simply limited to arrangements that have a commercial nature. The article suggests that schools are seeking the power to control students' activities to ensure continued control over the school environment.
Such extensions of control will be useful to examine in the context of my research thesis. Beyond school yards government instrumentalities may want control over what people have to say in order to reduce the spread of terrorism. Whilst these may be interesting extensions to the central point of my thesis I think I'll probably leave them out in the interests of clarity and available space.
Friday, 29 February 2008
Students get the sack for blogging
Posted by
Peter Fletcher
at
10:44
0
comments
Links to this post
Labels: Blogs, free speech, students, thesis statement
Thursday, 28 February 2008
Free speech on a blog not a First Amendment issue
In this article readers are advised that the First Amendment of the US doesn't protect the free speech of bloggers.
Posted by
Peter Fletcher
at
17:02
0
comments
Links to this post
Labels: Blogs, first amendment, free speech
Columbine shooters and teacher in trouble
FREE SPEECH AT CORE OF TEACHER'S ARREST ; HIS ONLINE BLOG COMMENT RILES SOME READERS, BUT HIS RIGHT TO EXPRESS IT IS DEFENDED BY OTHERS.
Case of a school teacher who caused a few problems for himself praising the Columbine shooters.
Posted by
Peter Fletcher
at
12:28
0
comments
Links to this post
Labels: Blogs, free speech, honours research
Thursday, 14 February 2008
Keywords for research
Keywords I'll be using for my thesis research will be:
- free speech
- free expression
- workplace
- blog
- blogs
- weblogs
Posted by
Peter Fletcher
at
16:53
0
comments
Links to this post
Friday, 1 February 2008
Why blogging is different to print publication
Much of the tension created between employers and private bloggers stems from what is said about the company on the blog. This tension is not new though. People could, and still do, publish their thoughts about their employer and their work mates via a letter to the editor or an interview on the radio or television. There is, however, a big difference between a blog and traditional broadcast media.
Broadcast media are expensive to set up and operate and operate in a zero sum game. If a story runs, it does so at the expense of another story. The result is only those stories that are likely to capture and maintain the attention of a mass audience are likely to receive air play or go to print. For mass media operators, big audiences mean big advertising revenues and big profits. It's a simple matter of creating the highest likelihood of making a profit.
Media metrics, such as these, have, in many ways shielded companies from negative publicity. Unless a story about a company is outrageously compelling it is unlikely to make even the early, early morning edition of the news. Blogs are not subject to the same economic model.
As Clay Shirky attests, blogs have very low barriers to entry (this one, aside from my time, is completely free), have no economies of scale (it's just as cheap to publish to an audience of 1 as to 1 000 001), and there is a limitless supply (the creation of this blog doesn't mean that another blog can't be made). In effect, blogs change completely the economics of publication and therefore provide the perfect environment for the rise of what Shirky calls "mass amateurization". In other words, anyone with access to the Internet can now be a blogger; and publish their thoughts about their boss, their company, their colleagues.
Never before have businesses faced such an immense risk, and never before have employees had so much publishing power - not to mention a potential worldwide audience - at their disposal. It is small wonder that businesses are becoming so concerned about the power of the blogger. One wonders how long it will take for unions to join in the battle on behalf of their constituents.
Posted by
Peter Fletcher
at
09:50
0
comments
Links to this post
Labels: Blogs, Clay Shirky, economics of blogs, mass amateurization, mass media