<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Neil Jenman feeling a tad insecure?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://peterfletcher.com.au/2008/12/12/is-neil-jenman-feeling-a-tad-insecure/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://peterfletcher.com.au/2008/12/12/is-neil-jenman-feeling-a-tad-insecure/</link>
	<description>Blogging, Facebook, Twitter and Fitness.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 06:09:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: lxvxjxnkie</title>
		<link>http://peterfletcher.com.au/2008/12/12/is-neil-jenman-feeling-a-tad-insecure/comment-page-1/#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>lxvxjxnkie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 10:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peterfletcher.com.au/?p=371#comment-49</guid>
		<description>I think Jennan expressed himself crudely - there&#039;s an aspect of dominance in his confident pronouncement of the fact of Asian superstitiousness, and it&#039;s especially problematic because of the association drawn in Western culture between superstition and cultural primitiveness.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;That said, some of your analysis is applicable to anything &lt;i&gt;at all&lt;/i&gt; spoken at the level of culture; knowledge of cultures is not and could never be empirical and inevitably involves some of what Derrida called the unavoidable violence of speech.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Daniel</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Jennan expressed himself crudely &#8211; there&#8217;s an aspect of dominance in his confident pronouncement of the fact of Asian superstitiousness, and it&#8217;s especially problematic because of the association drawn in Western culture between superstition and cultural primitiveness.</p>
<p>That said, some of your analysis is applicable to anything <i>at all</i> spoken at the level of culture; knowledge of cultures is not and could never be empirical and inevitably involves some of what Derrida called the unavoidable violence of speech.</p>
<p>Daniel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

